| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01855nam a22002177a 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
GY-GeU |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20240730145606.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
240730b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Transcribing agency |
UG |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Holloway, Margaret and Dominelli, Lena |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Ethics and governance in social work research in the UK / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc |
Lena Dominelli and Margaret Holly |
| 246 ## - VARYING FORM OF TITLE |
|---|
| Title proper/short title |
Ethics and governance in social work research in the UK / |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Oxford, UK, |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc |
Oxford University Press, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc |
July, 2008. |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
1009- 1024 p. |
| 310 ## - CURRENT PUBLICATION FREQUENCY |
|---|
| Current publication frequency |
Monthly |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
|---|
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
July, 2008. |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT |
|---|
| Volume number/sequential designation |
Volume 38, Number 5 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
The application of formal research ethics governance structures in social work research have lagged behind those applicable in health, although in the UK, social care has been deemed to be covered by those that were used in the NHS. Whilst this link is useful, it does not facilitate researcher involvement in the small-scale qualitative studies that feature in social work more than in health. Our exploration of the subject reveals that the dominance of the natural sciences paradigm in the social science is evident nationally, regionally and internationally. So, in this sense, the UK follows the usual paths that Favours quantitative studies. In this article we explore the trajectory of governance structures in social work research in the UK to argue that social work needs its own ethics and governance structures, but that some agreement should be sought with other professions, particularly in those projects that cross professional and discipline boundaries so that social work research does not have to undergo dual processes for ethical approval. This implies a broader recognition of social work research ethics and governance structures than currently exist. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Professional practice |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|