Assessing student social workers' professional suitability: (Record no. 326512)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02036nam a22002177a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field GY-GeU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20240813095609.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240813b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency UG
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Currer, Caroline
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Assessing student social workers' professional suitability:
Remainder of title comparing university procedures in England
Statement of responsibility, etc Caroline Currer
246 ## - VARYING FORM OF TITLE
Title proper/short title Assessing student social workers' professional suitability:
Remainder of title comparing University procedures in England
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Oxford, UK,
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Oxford University Press,
Date of publication, distribution, etc December, 2009.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 1481- 1498 p.
310 ## - CURRENT PUBLICATION FREQUENCY
Current publication frequency Monthly
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation December, 2009.
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Volume number/sequential designation Volume 39, Number 8
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Universities providing social work education and training must ensure that those who qualify as social workers are 'suitable' or 'fit for practice'- a gate- keeping role that has been discussed in a number of different national settings. In England, the introduction of registration for both qualified and student social workers has brought assessment of standards of professional conduct to the fore. For qualified workers, there is a single national 'conduct procedure' involving a public panel hearing. In relation to student social workers, procedures are particular to each university., albeit subject to scrutiny by the professional body, which has, to date, offered little guidance. This paper reports on a study comparing procedures in different universities. These were found to vary in relation to a number of factors, such as whether professional suitability is an academic or disciplinary matter, the name of the procedure and rationale; its focus and scope; the personnel involved and possible outcomes. The paper concludes that such variation is in the interests of neither students nor the profession, and that the professional body might helpfully offer more guidance to universities, as well as being specific about their own role in relation to aspects of registration.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Professional regulation
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Holdings
Price effective from Permanent Location Date last seen Not for loan Date acquired Source of classification or shelving scheme Koha item type Shelving location Damaged status Lost status Withdrawn status Current Location Public note
2024-08-13Turkeyen Campus2024-08-13 2024-08-13 2 Hours LoanEducation & Humanities   Turkeyen CampusThe British Journal of Social Work