High thresholds for receipt of children's services have become a major concern in recent policy documents. This concern involves the lack of access for such families whose circumstances are such that they have considerable need of them. A further concern is that, without access to these services, families will be referred later with more serious problems that will require intervention and use more resources. This paper seeks to test these assertions by examining the outcomes at six months for service applicants who receive only an initial assessment but are not given further intervention. Findings demonstrate that, while these were, indeed, high need families, the majority improved significantly without formal support. A minority, however, showed no improvement or actually deteriorated. These, however, are difficult to identity, and the examination of the presence of external Locus of Control and Depression, factors which may be expected to influence outcome negatively, showed this was not the case. The findings have considerable significance for current policy, and, although we can only speculate on the basis of these data it may be that the absence of social support may be a key variable which should be included in eligibility criteria enhancing targeting of vulnerable families.