There is a growing interest on the part of community groups, academics and funders in developing collaborative research projects between researchers and community groups. The authors of this paper collaborated with a community- based advocacy group on a study that focused on home repair problems faced by low- income homeowners in Philadelphia, PA (the 'Home Repair Study'). In this article, we provide a critical analysis of the collaborative process between social work advocates and academic social work researchers based on participatory observation and in- depth interviews with those advocates who participated directly in the planning and implementation of the Home Repair Study. Similar to accounts provided in previously published articles, our findings suggest that such collaborations will frequently encounter tensions resulting from the different roles that researchers and community- based advocates fulfil in the research field and in the political arena. However, we argue that these tensions are healthy; if managed effectively, they contribute to more comprehensive research and more effective policy advocacy.